Banargent v. Little, No. 7:2012cv00195 - Document 23 (N.D. Tex. 2012)

Court Description: Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 21 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Complaint, filed by Robert Lee Banargent. Plaintiffs civil rights claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiffs habeas claims are DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall open and close a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for statistical purposes. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 12/4/2012) (trt)

Download PDF
Banargent v. Little Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION ROBERT LEE BANARGENT, TDCJ #1337759, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v. L. LITTLE, COIV, Defendant. Civil No. 7:12-CV-195-O-BL ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of Plaintiff’s “Instructions” (Doc. No. 22), I am of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and it is hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court. Plaintiff’s civil rights claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff’s habeas claims are DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall open and close a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for statistical purposes. SO ORDERED this 4th day of December, 2012. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.