Corrales v. Astrue, No. 7:2011cv00142 - Document 21 (N.D. Tex. 2012)
Court Description: Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 20 Findings and Recommendations on Case. Accordingly, the Commissioners decision denying Plaintiffs application is REVERSED and REMANDED for further consideration of all the evidence beginning at Step 2 of the sequential evaluation process (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 12/31/2012) (trt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Corrales v. Astrue Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION LISA B. CORRALES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 7:11-cv-00142-O-BF ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney with respect to this appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s application is REVERSED and REMANDED for further consideration of all the evidence beginning at Step 2 of the sequential evaluation process. SO ORDERED on this 31st day of December, 2012. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
