Stalcup et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana, No. 6:2022cv00019 - Document 16 (N.D. Tex. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER granting 9 Motion to Cap Attorney Fees; adopting Report and Recommendations re 12 Findings and Recommendations on Case. The Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Safeco's motion (Dkt. No. 9) is granted. The plaintiffs shall be precluded from being awarded attorneys' fees incurred after June 15, 2022. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 11/30/2022) (dsr)

Download PDF
Stalcup et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana Doc. 16 Case 6:22-cv-00019-H-BU Document 16 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION CORBIN STALCUP, et a1., I Plaintiffs, I No. 6:22-CV-019-H SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA, Defendant ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATI ON OF THE UNITED STATE S MAGISTRATE JUDGE On November 14,2022, United States Magistrate Judge John R. Parker made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in this case. Dkt. No. 12. ludge Parker recommended that the Court grant Safeco's motion to cap aftorneys' fees. Id' at4. No objections to the FCR were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation only for plain Douglass v. tJnited Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F .3d 1415, 1417 (5th on other grounds,2S (5th Ct. U.S.C. $ Ct. etor. See 1996), superseded by statute 636O)(1); Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol,975 F.3d 488,502 2020). The Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Safeco's motion (Dkt. No. 9) is granted. The plaintifB shall be precluded from being awarded attomeys' fees incurred after June 15, 2022. Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:22-cv-00019-H-BU Document 16 Filed 11/30/22 So ordered on November 30, Page 2 of 2 PageID 118 2022 ESLEY HENDRIX JAME UNI D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.