Ellis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, No. 6:2020cv00066 - Document 29 (N.D. Tex. 2022)

Court Description: Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations re: 28 Findings and Recommendations on re: 5 Amended Complaint, filed by Brenda Jean Ellis. The Court has examined the record and reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR (Dkt. No. 28). The Court affirms the final adverse decision of the Commissioner, and this case is dismissed. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 1/7/2022) (dsr)

Download PDF
Ellis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration Doc. 29 Case 6:20-cv-00066-H-BU Document 29 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 855 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION BRENDA JEAN E., Plaintiff, No. 6:20-CV-066-H-BU KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Securiry. Defendant ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF TIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE TLIDGE United States Magistrate Judge John R. Patker made Flndings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) regarding the finai adverse decision of the Commissioner of Social Security on November 10,202I. SeeDkt. No. 28. Judge Parker recommended that the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision. Id. at 1. Where no specific objections are fi1ed wrthin 14 days after apaty is served with a copy, the Court must review the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation only for plarn error. See Douglass v. United Sens. Auto. Ass'n,79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cn.1996), supersededbysratute onotherglounds,28U.S.C. g 636(b)(1); Serrano y. Customs&BorderPatrol, U.S. Customs&BorderProt.,975 F.3d488, 502 (5th Cir.2020). No objections were flled within the 14-day period. The Court has examined the record and reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR (Dkt. No. 28). The Court affirms the final adverse decision of the Commissioner, and this case is dismissed. Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:20-cv-00066-H-BU Document 29 Filed 01/07/22 So ordered on January Page 2 of 2 PageID 856 ) n)') JAME UNI 2 SLEYHENDRIX D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.