Urteago v. Bridgestone Americas Inc, No. 6:2020cv00019 - Document 16 (N.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Finding no errors in the proposed FCR, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge 15 . Bridgestone Americas Inc.s motion to dismiss 6 is granted based on res judicata grounds, and all plaintiffs claims against Bridgestone are dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 1/13/2021) (pnp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Urteago v. Bridgestone Americas Inc Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION TONY J. URTEAGO, Plaintiff, v. No. 6:20-CV-019-H-BU BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS INC. Defendant. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge John R. Parker made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in this case on December 16, 2020. See Dkt. No. 15. Judge Parker recommended that the Court grant the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 6) and dismiss plaintiff’s claims as barred by res judicata. No objections to the FCR were filed. The District Court has therefore reviewed the proposed FCR for clear error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge. Bridgestone Americas Inc.’s motion to dismiss is granted based on res judicata grounds, and all plaintiff’s claims against Bridgestone are dismissed with prejudice. So ordered on January 13, 2021. __________________________________ JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
