Inglet v. Astrue, No. 6:2008cv00014 - Document 30 (N.D. Tex. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER - ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations, the cause is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C. Section 405(g). Upon remand the ALJ should clearly consider each of the six factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. Section 404.1527(d)(2) and/or consider whether to obtain or update an opinion of a treating or examining physician regarding Plaintiff's impairments and limitations. (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/17/09) (jkl)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Inglet v. Astrue Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION ALTON M. INGLET, JR., Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-014-C ECF ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed August 28, 2009 (Doc. 29). No written objections have been filed. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court and that this cause is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the ALJ should clearly consider each of the six factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(2) and/or consider whether to obtain or update an opinion of a treating or examining physician regarding Plaintiff’s impairments and limitations Dated September 17, 2009. _________________________________ SAM R. CUMMINGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
