Ramirez v. Garcia et al, No. 5:2022cv00250 - Document 16 (N.D. Tex. 2023)
Court Description: Order Accepting and Adopting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations re: 15 Findings and Recommendations on 1 Complaint filed by Julian E Ramirez. The plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/16/2023) (bdg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ramirez v. Garcia et al Doc. 16 Case 5:22-cv-00250-H-BQ Document 16 Filed 08/16/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 56 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION JULIAN RAMIREZ. Plaintiff, No. 5:22-CV-250-H-BQ (Consolidated with 5:22-CY-259-H) ROBERTO GARCIA, et al., Defendants. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the plaintiffs claims be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Dkt. No. 15. No objections were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation only for Douglass v. United Sens. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F .3d 1415, 1477 (5th on other groun*,28 U.S.C. $ plail enor. Cir. 1996), superseded See by statute 636(bXl); Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, 975 F.3d 488, 502 (5th Cn. 2020). The Disrict Coun has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice as baned by the statute of limitations. So ordered onlugurt /G ,2023. JAMES UN SLEY HENDRIX STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
