Newton v. Crosby County 72nd District Court et al, No. 5:2022cv00039 - Document 10 (N.D. Tex. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RE: 9 Findings and Recommendations on 3 Complaint, filed by Marvin E. Newton. The case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/8/2022) (krr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Newton v. Crosby County 72nd District Court et al Doc. 10 Case 5:22-cv-00039-H-BQ Document 10 Filed 06/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 24 I.]NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION MARVIN E. NEWTON, Plaintiff, No. 5:22-CV-039-H CROSBY COUNTY 72nd DISTRICT COURT, et al., Defendants ORDER ADOPTING TIIE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDA ON OF THE UNITED STATES MAG ISTRATE JUDGE By a standing order ofreference, this case was referred to Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr., for pretrial management. Dkt. No. 1. Judge Bryant issued numerous orders instructing the plaintiff to comply with various requirements. Nos. 2; 4; 8. None were abided. .!ae See Dkt. Dkt. Nos. 4; 8. Judge Bryant then made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation that the Court dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for want of prosecution, as contemplated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Dkt. No. 9. The plaintiffmade no objections to Judge Bryant's FCR, so the Court has reviewed it for plain error alone. Because no error-plain or otherwise-can be found in the FCR, the Court adopts it in fuIl: The case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l(b). So ordered on June 8 ,zozz. 4\/4J WESLEY HENDRIX D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
