Patterson v. Rose et al, No. 5:2021cv00142 - Document 26 (N.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 24 Findings and Recommendations. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate. It is therefore O RDERED that Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 22) is DENIED. This case will remain on the docket of United States Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr., for continued judicial screening as described in the Order entered 09/29/21 (Doc. 17). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/20/2021) (bmh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Patterson v. Rose et al Doc. 26 Case 5:21-cv-00142-BQ-C Document 26 Filed 12/20/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 126 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DTVISION PERRY PATTERSON, Institutional ID No. 1673121 $ $ $ Plaintiff, $ s $ CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-00142-BQ $ DR. LINDA ROSE, e, a/., s $ Defendants. $ ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STA TES MAGISTRATE JUD GE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation regarding Plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction in this case. No objections were made an independent examination and Recommendation for plain filed The District Court ofthe record in this case and reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report enor. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate' It is therefore oRDERED that PlaintifPs request for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 22) is DENIED. Bryant, Jr., for This case will remain on the docket of united states Magistrate Judge D. Gordon continued judicial screening as described in the Order e nt a Dated December :1 , 2021 September 021 (Doc. l7). . I lz, 44",'2"-v ) S Senidr United S District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
