Layton v. McClain et al, No. 5:2021cv00122 - Document 39 (N.D. Tex. 2022)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge re: 34 Findings and Recommendations on re: 1 Complaint filed by Bryan Joseph Layton. It is ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 34) are ADOPTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Beltran are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Ordered by District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 11/18/2022) (bdg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Layton v. McClain et al Doc. 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION BRYAN JOSEPH LAYTON, Institutional ID No. 06144600, Plaintiff, v. MARSHA McCLAIN, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-122-M-BQ § § § § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge advising that the Court should dismiss without prejudice all claims against Defendant Beltran in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). ECF No. 34. Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has now expired. After making an independent review of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Court concludes that the Findings and Conclusions are correct. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 34) are ADOPTED, and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Beltran are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2022. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
