Emerson v. Lumpkin et al, No. 5:2021cv00013 - Document 19 (N.D. Tex. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 16 Findings and Recommendations on re: 1 Complaint filed by Christopher Smith-Emerson. Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). All relief not expressly granted and any pending motions are denied. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 5/24/2022) (bmh)

Download PDF
Emerson v. Lumpkin et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCKDIVISION CHRISTOPHER SMITH-EMERSON, Instirutronal ID No. 02305284, SID No. 8041M3 Plaintiff, No. 5:21-CV-00013-H BOBBYLUMPKIN, eral., Defendants ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF TIIE LINITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court independently examined the record and reviewed the findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. As a result, Plaintiffs complaint and all claims alleged therein are dismissed without prejudice for want ofprosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). A11 relief not expressly granted and any pending motions are denied. The Court will enter judgment accordingly. So ordered, DatedMay?'{ ,2022. I S U ted WESLEY HENDRIX Disnict Judge States Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.