Kathryn G. v Commissioner of Social Security, No. 5:2020cv00021 - Document 25 (N.D. Tex. 2020)

Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations, RE: 22 Findings and Recommendations on 1 Complaint. For the reasons stated therein, thedecision of the Comissioner is hereby AFFIRMED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 9/14/2020) (krr)

Download PDF
Kathryn G. v Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 25 IN TIIE UNI'IED STA'TES DIS'|RICI-COURT FOR ]'HE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION KATHRYN G..I ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintif'I. ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Del'endant. ) Civil Action No. 5:20-CV-021-C-BQ ()RDI'R Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that the decision of the Commissioner should be affirmed. Plaintilf timely filed objections to the Magistrale Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on September 3,2020. The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge's report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C. \ 636(b)(1)(C). Portions o1'thc rcport or proposed lindings or rccommcndations that are notthc subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United Stares v. Wilson,864 F'.2d Alier due consideration and having conducted Plaintifls objections should be l2l9,l22l a de (5th Cir. 1989) noto review, the Court I'rnds that OVEITRULED. 'l'hc Court has further conducted an independent review ofthe Magistrate Judge's tindings and conclusions and finds no error. It is rTo protect privacy concerns ofplaintiffs in social security cases, the undersigned identifies the Plaintiffonly by first name and last initial. Dockets.Justia.com therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions oithc Court. For the reasons stated therein, the dccision ol'the Conrrnissioner is hereby AFFIRMED and Plaintifls Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED this /4 ,l day of September. 2020 C S OR GS s'f IS'fRICT JUDGE ( 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.