Rodriguez v. Stephens, No. 5:2013cv00233 - Document 38 (N.D. Tex. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Rodriguez has failed to demonstrate that the state court's adjudication of his claims was contrary to, or an unreasonable application, of Supreme Court law and the instant application for writ of habeas corpus s hould be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. All relief not expressly granted should be DENIED and all pending motions not previously ruled on should be DENIED. A certificate of appealability should be DENIED. Rodriguez may proceed in forma pauperis if he files a notice of appeal. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/1/2016) (Attachments: # 1 pages 49-96) (cb)

Download PDF
Rodriguez v. Stephens Doc. 38 Att. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.