Lozano v Commissioner, Social Security Administration, No. 4:2021cv01365 - Document 19 (N.D. Tex. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: re 18 Findings and Recommendations on Case. The Court ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Conclusions as its own. The undersigned review ed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the final decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS to the agency for further proceedings. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/23/2023) (tjc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lozano v Commissioner, Social Security Administration Doc. 19 Case 4:21-cv-01365-P Document 19 Filed 03/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 786 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ROSA LOZANO, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:21-CV-01365-P COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This is an action seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff Rosa Lozano’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II and supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. See ECF No. 1. This action was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton, for submission to this Court of findings, conclusions, and recommendations (“FCRs”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 2, 2023, Judge Cureton submitted Findings and Conclusions and recommended that the Court vacate the Commissioner’s decision and remand to the agency for further proceedings. See ECF No. 18. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s FCR is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. The Court thus ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Conclusions as its own. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the final decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS to the agency for further proceedings. SO ORDERED on this 23rd day of March 2023. Mark T. Pittman UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
