James v. Texas Department of Justice Parole Board et al, No. 4:2021cv01303 - Document 11 (N.D. Tex. 2022)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 10 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Complaint,, filed by Albert James. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/7/2022) (wxc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
James v. Texas Department of Justice Parole Board et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ALBERT JAMES, Plaintiff. v. No. 4:21-cv-1303-P TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PAROLE BOARD, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case on February 9, 2022. ECF No. 10. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s FCR is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the reasoning in the Magistrate Judge’s FCR. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED on this 7th day of March, 2022. ______________________________ Mark T. Pittman United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
