Downing v. Pondugula et al, No. 4:2021cv01006 - Document 33 (N.D. Tex. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 32 Findings and Recommendations on Motion. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b) (ECF No. 15 ) should be, and is hereby, DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/14/2022) (npk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Downing v. Pondugula et al Doc. 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION JANE' DOWNING, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:21-cv-1006-P-BJ KISHORE PONDUGULA ET AL., Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case. ECF No. 32. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b) (ECF No. 15) should be, and is hereby, DENIED. SO ORDERED on this 14th day of April, 2022. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
