Woodards v. The Michael's Companies et al, No. 4:2020cv00696 - Document 8 (N.D. Tex. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 7 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Complaint filed by Tre'von A. Woodards. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 2 ) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/28/2020) (npk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Woodards v. The Michael&#039;s Companies et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION TRE’VON A. WOODARDS, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § THE MICHAELS COMPANIES, et al., § § Defendants. § Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-00696-O-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED on this 28th day of September, 2020. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
