Crenshaw v. Saul, No. 4:2020cv00347 - Document 12 (N.D. Tex. 2020)

Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 11 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Complaint,, filed by Annie Y Crenshaw. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/30/2020) (wxc)

Download PDF
Crenshaw v. Saul Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ANNIE Y. CRENSHAW, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-00347-O-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with court orders. If, however, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff pays the filing fee for civil cases or files a signed motion or application to proceed in forma pauperis, the case will be retained on the docket and will be referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further consideration. Dockets.Justia.com Plaintiff is warned that even though this dismissal is without prejudice, any future refiling of the case may be subject to a limitations defense due to the timetable for filing appeals of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. SO ORDERED on this 30th day of June, 2020. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.