Sherman v. Allison et al, No. 4:2014cv00583 - Document 10 (N.D. Tex. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge re 8 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 6/3/2015) (ult)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sherman v. Allison et al Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION TALEK SHERMAN, Plaintiff, v. DENISE ALLISON and BBVA COMPASS, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-583-O ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 8. No objections were filed.1 The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted as the findings of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED on this 3rd day of June, 2015. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 On May 27, 2015, Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court in which Plaintiff stated he “wish[ed] to appeal the decision of the Magistrate Judge,” and Plaintiff requested that his case be “referred to the district judge for further action.” See Pl.’s Letter, ECF No. 9. Plaintiff makes no specific references to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s letter does not constitute an objection to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) (“[A] party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.”) (emphasis added). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
