McMichael v. Colvin, No. 4:2013cv00860 - Document 25 (N.D. Tex. 2015)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 21 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Complaint, filed by Tina McMichael. The court accepts the recommendation of the magistrate judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissio ner that, based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on August 3, 2010, plaintiff is not disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act be, and is hereby, affirmed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 3/10/2015) (mem)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McMichael v. Colvin Doc. 25 'l li.S. COl :nT NORTHERN DISTRICT Of TEXAS FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TE FORT WORTH DIVISION TINA MCMICHAEL, I .. CLERK, u.s. DISTRICT COURT .By_ § § Plaintiff, couRf l MAR I 0 2015J s . § . . I / § vs. § § CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, § Defendant. § NO. 4:13-CV-860-A § § § ORDER Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Tina McMichael is plaintiff and Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ("Commissioner") is defendant. This is an action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claim for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. On January 20, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings and conclusions and his recommendation, and granted the parties until February 3, 2015, in which to file and serve any written objections thereto. Plaintiff filed her objections on February 2, 2015, and Commissioner filed a response on February 11, 2015. After a thorough study of the record, the magistrate judge's proposed findings and conclusions, and applicable legal authorities, the court has concluded that Dockets.Justia.com plaintiff's objections lack merit and that the recommendation of the magistrate judge should be accepted. Therefore, The court accepts the recommendation of the magistrate judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that, based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on August 3, 2010, plaintiff is not disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act be, and is hereby, affirmed. SIGNED March 10, 2015. / JOH M / United States 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
