Moore v. Chandler, No. 4:2013cv00682 - Document 14 (N.D. Tex. 2013)
Court Description: Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 12 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Daniel Patrick Moore. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L Cureton no longer assigned to case. Petition under 28 USC 2241 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 12/30/2013) (wrb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Moore v. Chandler Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION DANIEL PATRICK MOORE, Petitioner, VS. RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, FCI-Fort Worth, Respondent. § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:13-CV-682-O ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS In this action brought by petitioner Daniel Patrick Moore under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause: 1. The pleadings and record; 2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on December 5, 2013; and 3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on December 18, 2013. The Court, after de novo review, concludes that the Petitioner’s objections must be overruled, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions. Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED. Daniel Patrick Moore’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed this 30th day of December, 2013. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
