Crainey v. Astrue, No. 4:2011cv00613 - Document 23 (N.D. Tex. 2012)
Court Description: Order Adopting 22 Findings and Recommendations: The court ORDERS that the decision of defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, that based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, and the application for supplemental security income, filed September 24, 2008, plaintiff, Pamela Crainey, is not disabled under sections 216(i), 223(d), and 1614(a) (3) (A) of the Social Security Act, be, and is hereby, affirmed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 11/19/2012) (mdf)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Crainey v. Astrue Doc. 23 u.s. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CC URT ' NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION tIN , 92012 CLERK, U.S. DlSTRICTC0uI(T -=__________ By ____ PAMELA CRAINEY, Deputy § § Plaintiff, § § VS. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. § § § § § § § NO. 4:11-CV-613-A ORDER Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Pamela Crainey is plaintiff and Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, is defendant. This is an action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under applicable provisions of the Social Security Act. On November 1, 2012, the united States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings and conclusions and his recommendation, and granted the parties until November 15, 2012, in which to file and serve objections. an objection. Neither party filed After studying the filings of the parties, the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and conclusions, and the applicable legal authorities, the court has decided to adopt the Dockets.Justia.com Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and conclusions and accept his recommendation. Therefore, The court ORDERS that the decision of defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, that based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, and the application for supplemental security income, filed September 24, 2008, plaintiff, Pamela Crainey, is not disabled under sections 216(i), 223(d), and 1614(a) (3) (A) of the Social Security Act, be, and is hereby, affirmed. // SIGNED November 19, 2012. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
