Sheppard v. Keffer, No. 4:2011cv00449 - Document 11 (N.D. Tex. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER granting 9 Findings and Recommendations on Case. Sheppard's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 USC 2241 dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and, alternatively, denied. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 11/10/2011) (uls)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sheppard v. Keffer Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION VICKIE PARKS SHEPPARD, Petitioner, § § § § § § § § VS. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC-Carswell, Respondent. CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-449-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS In this action brought by petitioner Vickie Parks Sheppard under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause: 1. The pleadings and record; 2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on October 14, 2011; and 3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on November 4, 2011. The Court, after de novo review, concludes that the Petitioner’s objections must be overruled and the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction for the reasons stated in the respondent’s September 12, 2011, response at section II, pages 3-4, and, alternatively, denied for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions. Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED. Dockets.Justia.com Vickie Parks Sheppard’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and, alternatively, DENIED. SIGNED November 10, 2011. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
