Childress v. Chapman, No. 4:2008cv00306 - Document 10 (N.D. Tex. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations. Respondent Chapman's July 16, 2008, motion to dismiss [docket no. 7] is GRANTED. Childress's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 12/15/08) (cxb) Modified on 12/15/2008/Dist 12/15 (cxb).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Childress v. Chapman Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ABBEY RENEA CHILDRESS, Petitioner, VS. ELAINE CHAPMAN, Warden, FMC-Fort Worth, Respondent. § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:08-CV-306-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Before the Court is the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 of petitioner Abbey Renea Childress, along with the November 13, 2008, findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge. The magistrate judge gave the parties until December 4 to file written objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation. As of the date of this order, no written objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this case, and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on November 13, 2008. The Court concludes that the petition for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions. Therefore, the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED. Respondent Chapman’s July 16, 2008, motion to dismiss [docket no. 7] is GRANTED. Dockets.Justia.com Abbey Renea Childress’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. SIGNED December 15, 2008. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
