Blair v. Astrue, No. 4:2008cv00010 - Document 19 (N.D. Tex. 2008)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION re 18 Findings and Recommendations: See Order for specifics. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 12/19/2008) (krg)

Download PDF

Blair v. Astrue Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION PHYLLIS BLAIR, on behalf of TERIONNE PHYLICIA BLAIR § § § § § § § § v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Commissioner of Social Security CIVIL ACTION NO.4:08-CV-010-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION On November 17, 2008, the United States magistrate judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings”) in the above-styled and -numbered cause. In his findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner Commissioner”) of the Social denying Security plaintiff Administration Phyllis Blair’s (“the claim for supplemental security income child benefits be affirmed. The magistrate judge’s order gave all parties until December 9 to serve and file with the Court written objections to his proposed findings. The Court has not received any written objections. As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions for plain error and has found none. Dockets.Justia.com Therefore, after review, the Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court, and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. SIGNED December 19, 2008. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.