Davis v. Astrue, No. 4:2008cv00009 - Document 22 (N.D. Tex. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS re 21 Findings and Recommendations: See Order for specifics. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 1/8/2009) (krg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Davis v. Astrue Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION BOBBI RAE DAVIS § § VS. § § MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner § of Social Security § ACTION NO. 4:08-CV-009-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS On November 21, 2008, the United States magistrate judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the abovestyled and numbered cause. The magistrate judge gave all parties until December 12 to serve and file with the Court written objections to his decision. No written objections have been received from either party. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error and has found none. Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. The decision of the Commissioner is therefore AFFIRMED. SIGNED January 8, 2009. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS -- Page Solo TRM/chr Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
