Onamuti v. ICE and Warden of Prairieland Detention Center, No. 3:2023cv00331 - Document 8 (N.D. Tex. 2023)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 6 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Oluwafunmilade Onamuti. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 4/13/2023) (svc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Onamuti v. ICE and Warden of Prairieland Detention Center Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION OLUWAFUNMILADE ONAMUTI, Petitioner, v. I.C.E. and WARDEN OF PRAIRIELAND DETENTION CENTER, Respondents. § § § § § § § § § § No. 3:23-CV-331-L-BH ORDER On March 14, 2023, the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Doc. 6) was entered, recommending that the court dismiss without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 4) and deny without prejudice his Pro Se Emergency Motion to Stay Order of Removal from the United States, Pending the Final Disposition of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 5), which were both received on February 14, 2023. The Report further recommends that, to the extent Petitioner seeks to assert other civil claims that are not habeas in nature, such claims should be dismissed without prejudice to seeking relief in a separate civil action because nonhabeas claim cannot be asserted in a habeas action. No objections to the Report were received as of the date of this order, and the time to object has passed. Having considered the Petition, Motion to Stay, pleadings, file, record, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court denies and dismisses without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and his Pro Se Emergency Motion to Stay Order of Removal from the United States, Pending the Final Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com Disposition of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docs. 4, 5). To the extent Petitioner seeks to assert other civil claims that are not habeas in nature, such claims are dismissed without prejudice to seeking relief in a separate civil action. A certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F. 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. It is so ordered this 13th day of April, 2023. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
