Miller v. United States Government, No. 3:2022cv02694 - Document 53 (N.D. Tex. 2023)

Court Description: Order Accepting 45 Findings and Recommendations. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims will be DISMISSED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 8/15/2023) (ndt)

Download PDF
Miller v. United States Government Doc. 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOHN WILLIAMS MILLER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:22-CV-2694-M-BH ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss, received on February 6, 2023 (doc. 19), is GRANTED. The plaintiff’s Motion: Demand Writ of Execution, filed on February 9, 2023 (doc. 22); Demand/Motion/Correction/“Removal of Illegal Defendant Representatives...”, filed on February 13, 2023 (doc. 28); Motion To Have Federal Marshals Arrest Immediately!!! Clayton Ray Mahaffey-DOJ, DUI Attorney..., filed on February 13, 2023 (doc. 30); Motion Plaintiff Invoking FRCP Rule 38(b)(2): Right to a Jury Trial; Demand, filed on February 21, 2023 (doc. 32); Motion: Execution of Writ of Execution relative to [ECF No. 11], filed on March 3, 2023 (doc. 36); Motion: Plaintiff is still awaiting “APPEARANCE”…, filed on March 9, 2023 (doc. 39); Motion: Corrected and legal Writ of Execution…, filed on March 9, 2023 (doc. 40); and Motion Hearing: To Start Trial Preparation with Discovery Scheduling, filed on March 10, 2023 (doc. 41), are DENIED. By separate judgment, the plaintiff’s claims will be DISMISSED. Dockets.Justia.com SIGNED this 15th day of August, 2023.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.