Goodloe v. Dallas County Courts, No. 3:2022cv02068 - Document 6 (N.D. Tex. 2022)

Court Description: Order Adopting 5 Findings and Recommendations re: 3 Complaint, filed by Michael Anthony Goodloe, Jr. Furthermore, Plaintiff is BARRED from filing future actions informa pauperri in this or any other federal court, without first obtaining leave of court to do so, and any case filed, removed, or transferred without the applicable filing fee, in which he is a plaintiff, should not be reviewed by the Court. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 10/11/2022) (ndt)

Download PDF
Goodloe v. Dallas County Courts Doc. 6 Case 3:22-cv-02068-C-BK Document 6 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16 IN THE LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEI- ANTHONY GOODLOE, JR., Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DAI,LAS COUNTY COURTS. Defendants. ) ) CiviI Action No. 3:22-CV-2068-C-BK ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that this civil action should be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. Plaintiffhas failed to file objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. are hereby It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions ofthe Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that this civil action be DISMISSED with prejudice. Furthermore, Plaintiff is BARRED from filing future actions informa pauperri in this or any other federal court, without first obtaining leave ofcourt to do so, and any case filed, removed, or transferred without the applicable filing fee, in which he is a plaintiff, should not be reviewed bythe Court. SO ORDERED tfris / // aay of O ctober,202 "47"7-7 CU R LIN GS D STATES DI CT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.