Dallas County et al v. Cavaness et al, No. 3:2022cv01558 - Document 11 (N.D. Tex. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 2/14/2023) (oyh)

Download PDF
Dallas County et al v. Cavaness et al Doc. 11 Case 3:22-cv-01558-E-BH Document 11 Filed 02/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 321 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DALLAS COUNTY et al., Plaintiffs, v. HENRY CAVANESS et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-01558-E-BH ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court conducted an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated July 20, 2022. (Doc. 4). Defendant Cavaness filed objections to the July 20, 2022, Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations for the United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 7). The Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. The Court has found no error in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 4). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 4). Furthermore, the Court conducted an independent review of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 18, 2022. (Doc. 8). On November 29, 2022, Defendant Cavaness filed objections to the November 18, 2022, Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations for the United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 9). The Court ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:22-cv-01558-E-BH Document 11 Filed 02/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 322 reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. The Court has found no error in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 8). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 8). Thus, the Court finds and concludes that the Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. 4 and 8) are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. (Docs. 4 and 8). SO ORDERED. 14th day of February, 2023. ___________________________________ ADA BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.