Thornton v. Pittman et al, No. 3:2022cv00605 - Document 19 (N.D. Tex. 2022)
Court Description: Order Accepting 15 Findings and Recommendations re: 11 Request for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Cour t. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs request for declaratory and injunctive relief- construed as a request for preliminary injunctive relief or a temporary restraining order-be DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 4/19/2022) (ndt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Thornton v. Pittman et al Doc. 19 Case 3:22-cv-00605-C-BT Document 19 Filed 04/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 133 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SHEDzuCK THORNTON, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) DR. MICHAEL PITTMAN, er a/., Defendants. ) ) ) Civil Action No . 3 :22-CY -0605 -C ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Plaintiffs request for declaratory and injunctive relief should be denied.r The Court conducls a de novo review ofthose portions ofthe Magistrate Judge's report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 tl.S.C. $ 636(bXlXC). Portions ofthe report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject ofa timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See united States v. llilson,864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989)' After due consideration and having condrtcted a de novo review, the court finds that Plaintiffs objections should be oVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the I plaintiff has filed tirnely objections 1o the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recorntnendation, Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:22-cv-00605-C-BT Document 19 Filed 04/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 134 Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs request for declaratory and injunctive relief--construed as a request for prelirninary injunctive relielor a temporary restraining order-be DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated April /f ,zOzz. 4 S 2 R. GS OR STATES D JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
