Ross v. USA, No. 3:2020cv02245 - Document 3 (N.D. Tex. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Habeas corpus petition is successive, and the clerk is directed to transfer the matter to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 8/17/2020) (svc)

Download PDF
Ross v. USA Doc. 3 Case 3:20-cv-02245-B-BH Document 3 Filed 08/17/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JARVIS DUPREE ROSS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:08-CR-167-B(3) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the defendant’s Motion Requesting Assistance of Counsel is CONSTRUED as a successive motion to vacate sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to (1) terminate the motion in this case; (2) open a new § 2255 habeas case; (3) docket the motion as a § 2255 motion filed June 30, 2020, in that new case; (4) directly assign the new case to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge as in this case; (5) file a copy of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and this order accepting those Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation; and (6) without further judicial action, immediately TRANSFER the newly opened § 2255 action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.1 1 A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required to appeal an order transferring a successive habeas petition. See In re Garrett, 633 F. App’x 260, 261 (5th Cir. 2016); United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683 (5th Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:20-cv-02245-B-BH Document 3 Filed 08/17/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 12 SIGNED this 17th day of August, 2020. _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Cir.2015).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.