Carracedo v. Barr et al, No. 3:2020cv01112 - Document 7 (N.D. Tex. 2020)
Court Description: Order Adopting 5 Findings and Recommendations. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/10/2020) (mla)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carracedo v. Barr et al Doc. 7 Case 3:20-cv-01112-C-BT Document 7 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47 IN THE LTNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION AN'I'oNIO CARRACL,DO. ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ) WILI.IAM BARR, er a1., ) ) Respondents. Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-1 I 12-C-BT ) ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United States Magistrate Judge therein advising that Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. $ 2241 should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civit Procedure 41(b).r The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that Petitioner's petition be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil/ocedure 4l1b;. SOORDERED nis /C dayofAugust.2020. Jl-' \ C S I R .7? 7 GS D STATE I Petitioner has failed to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Fi Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired. TRICT JUD(}E Conclusions, and Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
