Quick v. Castanon, No. 3:2020cv00535 - Document 6 (N.D. Tex. 2020)
Court Description: Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Steven Wayne Quick. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERE D that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, Petitioner's pro se application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is her eby DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner's right to file a motion for authorization to file a successive Section 2254 application in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/28/2020) (ndt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Quick v. Castanon Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT FOR THE NORTFIERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION S'I'IJVEN WAYNE QIJICK. ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ) ) LORIE DAVIS, Direcror TDC'J, ) ) Respondent. Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-0535-C-BN ) ORI)ER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Cou( that Petitioner'spro se application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. $ 2254 should be dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner's right to lrle a motion for authorization to file a successive Section 2254 application in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.r The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions ofthe Court. For the reasons stated therein, Petitioner's pro se application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S'C. $ 2254 is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner's right to file a motion for authorization to file a successivc Section 2254 applica tion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. tl SO ORDDRLD this "?t da)' of March, 20 I 'r4'f?'7 GS S OR TED STA S ISTRICT JUDGE I Ptaintiff has failed to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recomme ndation and the tinle to do so has now expircd Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
