Jeffery v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, No. 3:2020cv00164 - Document 9 (N.D. Tex. 2020)
Court Description: Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 8 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 5/11/2020) (mla)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jeffery v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID Doc. 9 Case 3:20-cv-00164-C-BH Document 9 Filed 05/11/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DiSTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTzuCT OF'|EXAS DALLAS DIVISION ANI-IIONY JEFFERY. ) Petitioner. ) ) ) ) ) LORI[, DAVIS. Diractor TDCJ. ) ) Respondent ) Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-164-C-BH ORDER Before the court are the Findings, conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe united States Magistrate Judge therein advising that Petitioner's Petition should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the Court.r The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore 0RDERED that the Findings, conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Cou(. For the reasons stated therein, Petitioner's Perition is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l (b). SO ORDERED this ,,,y'o^, **ay,2o2o. ,-'i y/, SA R.C OR 4,.v?.r4'"-? v GS STATES DIS I Peritioner has failed to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findi Reconrrnendation and the time to do so has now expired. CT JUDGE onclusions, and Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
