Whaley v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas et al, No. 3:2019cv02392 - Document 12 (N.D. Tex. 2020)
Court Description: Order Adopting 10 Findings and Recommendations denying 8 Motion for Correctness. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/24/2020) (mla)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Whaley v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas et al Doc. 12 Case 3:19-cv-02392-C-BH Document 12 Filed 08/24/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID 65 IN THE LINITED STA]'ES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEI- DEWAYNE WIIALEY. ) ) ) Petitioner. ) ) ) ) COL]RT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS. zr a/. ) ) I{cspondcnts Civil Action No. 3:l 9-CV-2392-C-BH oI{I)IiR Before the Cou( are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising that Petitioner's Motion for Correctness, construed as seeking reliefunder Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), should be denied.l The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated thercin, the Court ORDERS that Petitioner's Motion for Correctness, construed as seeking relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedpre 60(b). be DENIED. .y': SO ORDERED this 34 aay ofAugust.2020. q 7/rr,'r/ C S S R GS TED STNT SI'RICI'JUDGE I Petitioner has failed to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
