Okechuku v. USA, No. 3:2019cv01005 - Document 50 (N.D. Tex. 2021)

Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability: 49 The Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted re: 1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by Theodore E Okechuku. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 6/30/2021) (svc)

Download PDF
Okechuku v. USA Doc. 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION THEODORE E. OKECHUKU, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. § § § § § § § No. 3:19-cv-1005-B (BT) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated June 14, 2021, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Considering the record in this case, the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that the Movant has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court’s “assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the [motion] states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2021. _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.