Durham v. Berryhill, No. 3:2018cv02071 - Document 28 (N.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: Order Accepting 27 Findings and Recommendations : After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated April 6, 2021 , the Court finds that the Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 5/10/2021) (ndt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Durham v. Berryhill Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TERESA RENEE D., Plaintiff, V. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' No. 3:18-cv-2071-N-BN ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated April 6, 2021, the Court finds that the Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. SO ORDERED this 10th day of May, 2021. _____________________________________ DAVID C. GODBEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
