Myers v. Secretary United States Department of Agriculture, No. 3:2018cv01981 - Document 10 (N.D. Tex. 2018)
Court Description: Order Accepting 8 Findings and Recommendations. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 10/30/2018) (epm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Myers v. Secretary United States Department of Agriculture Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JESSE VAN MYERS, Plaintiffs, v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant. § § § § § § § § Civil Case 3:18-CV-1981-B-BK ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and for want of prosecution. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). The Court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions and recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the findings, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Dockets.Justia.com Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5).1 SO ORDERED this 30th day of October, 2018. _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the district court certifies an appeal as not taken in good faith.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
