Hernandez-Regalado v. United States of America, No. 3:2018cv00812 - Document 10 (N.D. Tex. 2018)

Court Description: Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/8/2018) (ykp)

Download PDF
Hernandez-Regalado v. United States of America Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JUNIOR M. HERNANDEZ-REGALADO, § #59016-177 § Plaintiff, § § v. § § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § Defendants. § Civil Case 3:18-CV-0812-D ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The district judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this finding, the court adopts and incorporates by reference the magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions and recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the findings, the court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Dockets.Justia.com See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). SO ORDERED. August 8, 2018. _________________________________ SIDNEY A. FITZWATER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.