Monroe Guaranty Insurance Company v. Newtex Realty LP, No. 3:2018cv00256 - Document 38 (N.D. Tex. 2019)

Court Description: Order Accepting 37 Findings and Recommendations re 14 Counterclaim Third Party Complaint, 25 MOTION to Dismiss (Third-Party Defendant IMA, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Newtex Realty, L.P.'s Third-party Complaint). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/19/2019) (aaa)

Download PDF
Monroe Guaranty Insurance Company v. Newtex Realty LP Doc. 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MONROE GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NEWTEX REALTY, LP, Defendant/Third-party Plaintiff, v. IMA WALDMAN, Third-party Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-256-L (BT) ORDER Before the court is Third-party Defendant IMA Waldman’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Newtex Realty, LP’s Third-party Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (Doc. 25), filed June 25, 2018. On March 4, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), recommending that the motion be granted and Defendant/Third-party Plaintiff Newtex Realty, LP’s Third-party Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. No objections to the Report were filed. Having reviewed the record in this case, Report, and applicable law, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Third-party Defendant IMA Waldman’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Newtex Realty, LP’s Third-party Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (Doc. Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 25), and dismisses without prejudice Defendant/Third-party Plaintiff Newtext Realty LP’s Thirdparty Complaint (Doc. 14). It is so ordered this 19th day of March, 2019. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.