Hernandez v. Mapei Corporation, No. 3:2017cv03515 - Document 21 (N.D. Tex. 2018)

Court Description: Order Accepting F 19 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 14 Motion to Dismiss. It is Ordered that the Plaintiff's claims in this action are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend within thirt y days of the date of this order, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint that cures the factual deficiencies raised by the Magistrate Judge. If no motion for leave to amend is filed within that time, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice without further notice. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/31/2018) (epm)

Download PDF
Hernandez v. Mapei Corporation Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LEONOR HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MAPEI CORPORATION, Defendants § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-3515-N-BK ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore Ordered that the Plaintiff’s claims in this action are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend within thirty days of the date of this order, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint that cures the factual deficiencies raised by the Magistrate Judge. If no motion for leave to amend is filed within that time, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice without further notice. SO ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2018. _______________________________________ THE HONORABLE DAVID C. GODBEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.