Henry v. Capital One Bank (USA) NA et al, No. 3:2017cv02962 - Document 34 (N.D. Tex. 2018)
Court Description: Order Accepting 33 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 26 Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 24 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's FDCPA claim and all defamation claims against Defendants Moss Law Firm,P.C. and Michael A. M oss, as well as defamation claims against Defendant Capital One premised on actions during the State Court Lawsuit are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's FCRA claim against both Defendants and defamation claim against Capital One premised on the provision of information to the CRAs are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a motion for leave to amend, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, by 9/27/2018. If Plaintiff fails to do so, said claims will be dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/11/2018) (epm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Henry v. Capital One Bank (USA) NA et al Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RAY HENRY, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-2962-M ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge Renée Harris Toliver made Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants Moss Law Firm, P.C. and Michael A. Moss’s Joint 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Statement of Amended Claim, Doc. 24, and Defendant Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Doc. 26, are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s FDCPA claim and all defamation claims against Defendants Moss Law Firm, P.C. and Michael A. Moss, as well as defamation claims against Defendant Capital One premised on actions during the State Court Lawsuit are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s FCRA claim against both Defendants and defamation claim against Capital One premised on the provision of information to the CRAs are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a motion for leave to amend, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, by September 27, 2018. If Plaintiff fails to do so, said claims will be dismissed with prejudice. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2018.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
