Ballesteros v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, No. 3:2017cv02856 - Document 7 (N.D. Tex. 2017)
Court Description: Order Adopting 6 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to refilling of an in forma pauperis lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the refiling of this lawsuit with full payment of $400.00 filing fee. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/11/2017) (axm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ballesteros v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RICARDO A. BALLESTEROS, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-2856-C-BK ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge advising that Plaintiffs prose complaint be summarily dismissed as barred by the three-strikes provision of28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). Plaintiff failed to file any objections and the time to do so has now expired. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the refiling of an in forma pauperis lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the refiling of this lawsuit with full payment of the $400.00 SO ORDERED this fee. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. _jf__ day of December 017. , Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
