Taylor v. Presiding Judge et al, No. 3:2017cv02660 - Document 10 (N.D. Tex. 2017)
Court Description: Order Accepting 8 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kevin Taylor. The case will be dismissed by separate judgment for failure to prosecute or follow court orders. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/12/2017) (epm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Taylor v. Presiding Judge et al Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KEVIN RAY TAYLOR, ID # 2070100, Petitioner, VS. PRESIDING JUDGE, 291ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2660-G (BH) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is Dockets.Justia.com DENIED. The case will be dismissed by separate judgment for failure to prosecute or follow court orders. SO ORDERED. December 12, 2017. ___________________________________ A. JOE FISH Senior United States District Judge -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
