Barker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, No. 3:2017cv02422 - Document 5 (N.D. Tex. 2018)

Court Description: Order: Habeas corpus petition is successive, and the clerk is directed to transfer the matter to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) Order Adopting 4 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 2 Motion for Leave to File. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/18/2018) (epm)

Download PDF
Barker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ARTHUR JOY AL BARKER, Petitioner, V. LORIE DA VIS, Director, TDCJ, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3: 17-CV-2422-C-BN ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge advising that Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be deemed an unauthorized successive petition and transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petitioner failed to file any objections and the time to do so has expired. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the above-styled and -numbered petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for appropriate action. Petitioner is admonished that any future motion concerning his state conviction filed without first obtaining leave from the Fifth Circuit may result in SO ORDERED this f8fiday of July, 201 . Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.