Callins v. Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC, No. 3:2017cv01975 - Document 19 (N.D. Tex. 2017)

Court Description: Order Accepting 14 Findings and Recommendations,re: 12 Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC. Thus, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the Motion for More Definite Statement is GRANTED in that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint using the pro se form attached to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 10/4/2017) (ndt)

Download PDF
Callins v. Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PATRICIA I. CALLINS, Plaintiff, vs. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. OF ARIZONA, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.3:17-CV-1975-C-BN ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclu­ sions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions ofthe Court. Thus, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the Motion for More Definite Statement is GRANTED in that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint using the pro se form attached to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Plaintiff should attach additional pages to the form to set out the facts supporting her claim. However, she should only use any additional pages to state "simply, concisely, and directly" all actions by Defendant that she contends entitle her to relief. Said amended complaint shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this ordel the ab~l~d and -numbered cause of action will be dismissed. SIGNED this 1..!!... day of £optemIJ8r, 2017 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.