Nance v. Meeks et al, No. 3:2017cv01882 - Document 37 (N.D. Tex. 2018)

Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations: The court determines that the 33 findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, accepts them as those of the court, grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20 ), and dismisses with prejudice this action and all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendants. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/30/2018) (ndt)

Download PDF
Nance v. Meeks et al Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JESSICA NANCE, Plaintiff, v. RANDY MEEKS; JERRY STEVENS; BRUCE MESSICK; TAMMY SHERMAN; BELINDA SPOONMORE; AMY LAM; CLIFTON KING; TIMOTHY WHITEHEAD; STEVEN NORTH; MARIA RODRIGUEZ; NATHANIEL AKERS; BRANDON CHAMBERS; and ANNA HIGGINS, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-1882-L ORDER This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge David L. Horan, who entered the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on August 1, 2018, recommending that the court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) on the affirmative defense of qualified immunity and dismiss this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report, even though she was granted an extension to September 14, 2018, to do so. After reviewing the pleadings, motions, briefs, evidence, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, accepts them as those of the court, grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20), and dismisses with prejudice this action and all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendants. Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com It is so ordered this 30th day of October, 2018. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.