Edwards v. Oliver et al, No. 3:2017cv01208 - Document 430 (N.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: Order Accepting 390 Findings and Recommendations re: 344 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Roy Oliver. The objections are overruled, and Defendant Roy Oliver's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 344) is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 3/9/2021) (ndt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Edwards v. Oliver et al Doc. 430 Case 3:17-cv-01208-M-BT Document 430 Filed 03/09/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16222 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ODELL EDWARDS, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Edwards, Deceased, VIDAL ALLEN and KEVON EDWARDS, Plaintiffs, SHAUNKEYIA KEYON STEPHENS, RHONDA WASHINGTON, MAXWELL EVERETTE, and MAXIMUS EVERETTE, Intervenor-Plaintiffs, v. ROY OLIVER and THE CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, TEXAS, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 3:17-cv-01208-M-BT ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated January 19, 2021. The Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were made. The objections are overruled, and Defendant Roy Oliver’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 344) is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 9th day of March, 2021. 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
