State of Texas et al v. Blakely, No. 3:2017cv01055 - Document 12 (N.D. Tex. 2017)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 6 Findings and Recommendations that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case, necessitating its remand to state court, the Court need not consider the merits of the 9 motion for TRO. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/12/2017) (svc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
State of Texas et al v. Blakely Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION THE STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, V. QUINCY BLAKELY, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § No. 3:17-cv-1055-B ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by Defendant Quincy Blakely. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. After filing his objections, Defendant filed a motion for temporary restraining order (“TRO”). But, because the Court has accepted Judge Horan’s recommendation that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case, necessitating its remand to state court, the Court need not consider the merits of the motion for TRO. SO ORDERED. DATE: May 12, 2017 _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -1- Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
